A Newsvendor Formulation of the Army and Army Reserve

Walter Bennette
05-01-2014

Overview

  1. Problem Statement
  2. Background and Justification
  3. Model
  4. Analysis
  5. Worth of Project

Problem Statement

The Army Reserve can be thought of as a strategic reserve for the Army.

Problem Statement

  • Soldiers voluntarily join the Army Reserve
  • Work/train 38 days per year
  • Receive some benefits
  • Work a regular job
  • Could be called into full time service

A relatively inexpensive inventory of soldiers ready for action

Problem Statement

Question: How many troops should be in the Army Reserve?

Answer:

Problem Statement

Question: How many troops should be in the Army Reserve?

Answer: Develop an inventory model to aide in this decision.

Background and Justification

Army Reserve:

  • Began in 1908
  • 205,000 strong (compare to 541,000 in the Army)
  • Can be called to active duty
  • Work 38 days a year
  • $3,216 per year

Background and Justification

Whats the right size for the US army?

  • Current budget proposal calls for reduction
  • Defense analyst thinks the size should increase

Background and Justification

  • We can use an inventory model to find the economically optimal decision.
  • This is crucial for fiscal responsibility

Model

Newsvendor:

  • Products lose value after time
  • Only one opportunity to place an order
  • Distribution of demand
  • Holding cost
  • Shortage cost

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Products lose value after time:

  • Soldiers have a limited shelf life. (Assume 8 years)
  • How many old soldiers do you know?

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Products lose value after time:

  • Soldiers have a limited shelf life. (Assume 8 years)
  • How many old soldiers do you know?

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Only one opportunity to place an order:

  • Assume they place an order every 8 years
  • This is a simplifying assumption
  • How many would sign up during war?

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Only one opportunity to place an order:

  • Assume they place an order every 8 years
  • This is a simplifying assumption
  • How many would sign up during war?

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Distribution of demand:

  • Historical data

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Holding cost:

  • Cost to recruit ($15,000)
  • Cost to pay ($3,216 a year)

Model

Newsvendor meets Army Reserve

Shortage cost:

  • Unknown
  • Loss of life and loss of freedoms
  • Can make a guess through analysis

Analysis

Calucluate Shortage Cost

  • Known demand distribution
  • Assume current troop level (S) is optimal
  • \( S^*=F^{-1}\left(\frac p{h+p} \right) \)
  • \( p=\frac{hF(S)}{1-F(S)} \)

Analysis

\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( S=746,291 \)
\( h=40,728 \ dollars \)

\( p=\frac{hF(S)}{1-F(S)}=Infinity \)

\( Type \ I \ service \ level=100\% \)

\( Type \ II \ service \ level=100\% \)

Analysis

\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( S=746,291 \)
\( h=40,728 \ dollars \)

\( p=\frac{hF(S)}{1-F(S)}=Infinity \)

\( Type \ I \ service \ level=100\% \)

\( Type \ II \ service \ level=100\% \)

Obviously troop levels are not determined with an economic model (or we have the wrong model)

Analysis

\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( S=643,791 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( p=\frac{hF(S)}{1-F(S)}=7.4 \ trillion \ dollars \)

\( Type \ I \ service \ level \approx 100\% \)

\( Type \ II \ service \ level \approx 100\% \)

Analysis

\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( S=643,791 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( p=\frac{hF(S)}{1-F(S)}=7.4 \ trillion \ dollars \)

\( Type \ I \ service \ level \approx 100\% \)

\( Type \ II \ service \ level \approx 100\% \)

Refinements must be made to the model

Analysis

Allow the decision to be made on service level

Type I:
\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( \alpha=0.999 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( S^{\alpha}=F^{-1}\left(\frac {\frac{h\alpha}{(1-\alpha)}}{h+\left(\frac{h\alpha}{(1-\alpha)} \right)} \right) = 594,239 \)

\( Reserve=52,948 \)

Analysis

Allow the decision to be made on service level

Type I:
\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( \alpha=0.999 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( S^{\alpha}=F^{-1}\left(\frac {\frac{h\alpha}{(1-\alpha)}}{h+\left(\frac{h\alpha}{(1-\alpha)} \right)} \right) = 594,239 \)

\( Reserve=52,948 \)
Demand met for 99.9% of planning periods

Analysis

Allow the decision to be made on service level

Type II:
\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( \beta=0.999 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( S^{\beta}=\sigma L^{-1}\left(\frac{\mu \left(1-\beta \right)}{\sigma} \right)+\mu=566,820 \)

\( Reserve=25,529 \)

Analysis

Allow the decision to be made on service level

Type II:
\( \mu=541,291 \)
\( \sigma=17,134 \)
\( \beta=0.999 \)
\( h=81,456 \ dollars \)

\( S^{\beta}=\sigma L^{-1}\left(\frac{\mu \left(1-\beta \right)}{\sigma} \right)+\mu=566,820 \)

\( Reserve=25,529 \)
99.9% of demand met

Project Worth

  • Prelim results indicate the Army may be too large
  • Obviously the inventory model needs to be refined
  • Similar techniques could be used to aide decision making

Questions?

Questions?

Walter Bennette
bennette@iastate.edu
bennette.github.io